> QUANTUM 05 :: bell states

Non-graded · offline · explore at your own pace

Two qubits, one shared answer

A Bell state is the simplest example of entanglement. Each qubit on its own gives a random 0 or 1, yet when both are measured in the same basis the results are perfectly correlated. For |Φ⁺⟩ they always match in both Z and X. It takes only two gates to build one, and the effect holds no matter how far apart the qubits travel. It still can't carry a message: each side alone just sees random bits, and the match only shows up when the two compare notes over an ordinary channel.

Entanglement — a state of two or more qubits that cannot be written as separate states for each qubit. Measuring one tells you about the other, because only the pair has a well-defined state.

Each pair is a fresh measurement of |Φ⁺⟩. Individually random, always in agreement.

01 · Refresher

Two-qubit states need four amplitudes

From page 01: two qubits have four basis states, |00⟩ |01⟩ |10⟩ |11⟩. Some two-qubit states can be split into "qubit A is this, qubit B is that." For example, |0⟩⊗|+⟩. A Bell state can't be split that way at all.

|Φ⁺⟩=1/√2 |00⟩ + 1/√2 |11⟩= 1/√2001/√2
no choice of (a|0⟩+b|1⟩) ⊗ (c|0⟩+d|1⟩) produces this vector: it would need ad = 0 and bc = 0 while ac and bd are both nonzero

02 · The core idea

Build a Bell state with H and CNOT

Put the first qubit into superposition with a Hadamard, then use it as the control for a CNOT. The target gets flipped "in the |1⟩ branch only," so the two qubits become correlated branch by branch.

Try it: choose the input and step through

Each of the four inputs produces a different Bell state. The vector shows all four amplitudes after each gate.

q0 |0⟩H● control
q1 |0⟩⊕ target

03 · Measuring the pair

Random on its own, perfect together

Alice takes one qubit and Bob takes the other. Each can measure in the Z basis (0 or 1) or the X basis (+ or −, by applying H first). Run many shots and compare their results.

Try it: measure the Bell state built above

Start with both in Z. Then try putting both in X, and finally use different bases.

No pairs measured yet.
No faster-than-light messages: Alice can't choose her result, so she can't use entanglement to send Bob anything. Bob's results look like random coin flips until the two compare notes over an ordinary channel. The correlation is real, but it carries no message by itself.

04 · The full set

The four Bell states

Click a state to see its formula and which input creates it.

05 · Security connection

Entanglement as a security tool

The E91 protocol (Artur Ekert, 1991) distributes Bell pairs to Alice and Bob. When they measure in matching bases, their results agree and become shared key bits. An eavesdropper who intercepts and measures a qubit disturbs the entanglement, and the correlations weaken in a way Alice and Bob can test statistically with a Bell test (CHSH).

BB84 (PAGE 07)
Alice sends single prepared qubits to Bob. Security comes from measurement disturbing the state.
E91
A source sends Bell pairs to both. Security comes from testing that the entanglement is intact.
SUMMARY SLIDESView the Quantum 05 slide deck: Bell States & Entanglement
PREVIOUS04 · Quantum gates