Digital Forensics Midterm Lab — Study Guide

CIS-2808 · Homicide Case Evidence Analysis (100 points, 4 parts)

Before You Start the Lab

Case Part 1 25 points

A photo on the suspect's phone may place them near the homicide location. You need to confirm where and when it was taken.

What this part is testing

Concepts to review

Forensic imagingA bit-for-bit duplicate that preserves the original evidence untouched.
Hashing for verificationComparing hash values of original vs. copy to prove they are identical.
EXIF metadataData embedded in a photo file describing when, where, and how it was captured.
GPS tags in EXIFLatitude/Longitude and a separate GPS Date/Time stamp, distinct from the file's Create Date.
Self-check questions
  • Why would an investigator hash both the original and the copy, rather than just the copy?
  • What's the difference between the image's "Create Date" and its "GPS Date/Time"? Could they ever disagree, and what would that mean for the case?
  • Which forensic tool(s) covered in class can display embedded EXIF fields, and what's the general workflow for pulling that info out?

Case Part 2 25 points

A second photo shows a river/stream. Investigators want to know why the suspect photographed this location — which means finding out where it actually is.

What this part is testing

Concepts to review

Coordinate formatsGPS metadata is often stored in degrees/minutes/seconds — you may need to convert it to decimal degrees.
Lab environment boundariesWhy this step deliberately requires a browser outside the NETLAB sandbox.
Geolocation toolsFree coordinate-to-map lookup services and how to read their output.
Self-check questions
  • If your extracted latitude/longitude are in DMS (degrees/minutes/seconds), how do you convert them to decimal degrees before plugging them into a map tool?
  • Why might an investigator need to look up a location using a tool outside the closed lab environment, rather than inside NETLAB?
  • What would it mean for the case if the photo's coordinates matched a location relevant to the homicide?

Case Part 3 25 points

The suspect appears to have deleted images from their laptop. You need to recover evidence that Windows keeps around even after deletion.

What this part is testing

Concepts to review

Thumbs.dbA Windows thumbnail cache database that stores small preview images of files viewed in a folder.
Data remanenceWhy deleting a photo doesn't necessarily delete every trace of it on the system.
File carvingPulling embedded files (like JPEGs) out of a container/database file rather than the normal filesystem.
Self-check questions
  • Why is Thumbs.db forensically valuable even after a suspect deletes the original photos?
  • What tool(s) from class can open or parse a Thumbs.db file, and what do they let you do with its contents?
  • What steps would you take to make sure the extraction was performed on the copy, not the original evidence file?

Case Part 4 25 points

Now that an image has been recovered from Part 3, you need to document its properties as evidence.

What this part is testing

Concepts to review

File Explorer propertiesWhere to find created/modified/accessed dates and file size for a given file.
Chain of custodyWhy every newly-extracted piece of evidence gets its own hash, even if it came from something already hashed.
Self-check questions
  • Why would you hash a file that was carved out of Thumbs.db, even though you already hashed the Thumbs.db file itself?
  • What Windows File Explorer view or dialog shows you the date/time and size properties of a single file?
  • Could the recovered image's file dates tell you something different from its embedded EXIF dates (if it had any)? Why might they differ?

Grading Reminders